The national implications of NJ’s Non-Citizen Voters artwork

The national implications of NJ’s Non-Citizen Voters

Brian Lehrer: A Daily Politics Podcast

July 24, 2026

An error in New Jersey led to registering about 6,600 non-citizens to vote, though only about 400 did.
Speakers: Brian Lehrer, Liza Weisberg, Mike Hayes
**Brian Lehrer** (0:05)
From WNYC, I'm Brian Lehrer. This is my Daily Politics Podcast. It's Friday, July 24th.
We're at the intersection of the New Jersey Motor Vehicles Department and the National Politics of Voter Registration. On Tuesday, you've probably heard this, Governor Mikey Sherrill announced that a software issue at DMV accidentally registered 6,000 non-citizens to vote, fewer than 10% of them or around 400 actually did. She says there's no evidence of this glitch affecting the outcome of any election in the state. But the revelation comes just as President Trump and the Republican Party generally are looking for new ways to make voter registration and actually casting ballots harder for the midterms. They say it's in the name of preventing voter fraud, despite the lack of evidence of anything major like that.
Of course, the history of Trump's claims about his loss to Joe Biden in 2020 But something did happen in New Jersey. State Republicans now say it's bigger than what the Democratic governor revealed and they want to roll back the state's so-called motor voter law that automatically registered citizens, supposed to be just citizens, through their contact with the DMV and the law that allows non-citizen immigrants to get driver's licenses. With us now, WNYC and Gothamist, New Jersey reporter Mike Hayes and Liza Weisberg, a supervising attorney at the ACLU of New Jersey, where she focuses on democracy and voting rights. Hi Mike, and by the way, is it Liza or Liza?

**Liza Weisberg** (1:40)
It's Liza. You got it right.

**Brian Lehrer** (1:42)
Hi Brian.

**Liza Weisberg** (1:42)
Thank you so much.

**Brian Lehrer** (1:44)
Thanks for coming on. Welcome to WNYC. Hey Mike. Liza, I want to start with the New Jersey Globe article you were quoted in back in April about the Trump administration suing New Jersey to turn over all its voter registration data. As an ACLU lawyer, you were obviously opposed to that.
So was the state. But give us the context. What kind of data did the Trump administration ask for and what did Governor Sherrill and the state do?

**Liza Weisberg** (2:12)
Yeah. So the Department of Justice has asked New Jersey and a number of states all across the country to turn over its unredacted voter files. So New Jersey is perfectly willing to share its voter file with the federal government and the government has access to it. It just insists on protecting the privacy of its voters and complying with federal and state privacy laws by redacting certain highly sensitive, personal identifying information like driver's licenses and partial social security numbers that are in those voter rolls. And so that's the aspect that the Department of Justice has taken issue with. And now every single court to hear these types of cases all around the country has rejected the DOJ's demand for these unredacted voter files. So so far that's 16 courts, 16 federal district courts and one federal circuit court.

**Brian Lehrer** (3:17)
Unredacted means it would include voters' names, addresses, dates of birth, in some cases partial drivers' licenses or social security numbers according to that article. But what's the risk to those people that you would argue exists? How could the federal government hypothetically use that personal information to harm innocent people?

**Liza Weisberg** (3:36)
Yeah, well, there's a lot of evidence in the public record that what the federal government is trying to do with that data is to use really unreliable tools and data matching and aggregation techniques to pour over states' voter files to try to sort of further their immigration enforcement policy objectives, right? We want to share these lists with agencies like DHS to go after voters that they have villainized and we know that when these kinds of programs are used, there are tons of positives, and so there's a real risk that voters would be disenfranchised through this type of process. And so we represent voters in this case, we're interveners in the case. We represent voters who are afraid that if the government gets their hands on their personal identifying information, they will be wrongly accused of improperly voting or registering to vote, even though they are eligible, and that the federal government will sort of take retaliatory action against them or otherwise invade their privacy and voting rights.

**Brian Lehrer** (5:00)
So, Mike Hayes, to the present, Governor Sherrill announces 6,000 non-citizens were registered to vote because of the software error at DMV, she says, and around 400 of those folks did actually vote in elections, which non-citizens aren't allowed to do. Did the state discover this because of pressure from Washington to inspect the voter rolls for non-citizens voting, like the things we were just discussing with Liza?

**Mike Hayes** (5:31)

12 more minutes of transcript below

Feed this to your agent

Try it now — copy, paste, done:

curl -H "x-api-key: pt_demo" \
  https://spoken.md/transcripts/1000651996090

Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and any agent that makes HTTP calls.

From $0.10 per transcript. No subscription. Credits never expire.

Using your own key:

curl -H "x-api-key: YOUR_KEY" \
  https://spoken.md/transcripts/1000778233944