What Lindsay Clancy's Lawyer Tried To Give The Court

**Tony Brueski** (0:00)
This is Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski. Here now, Tony Brueski.

**Tony Brueski** (0:06)
The Lindsay Clancy Trial is about to get underway, and we are going to be covering it for you right here, every single day, courtroom coverage. If you want to hear audio of the courtroom, then check out our podcast, Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski. Wherever you get podcasts, search it, find it, press subscribe, and you will be able to to dig into the audio of this case every single day. And here on the YouTube channel, we are also going to be bringing you synopsis, expert analysts, breaking down what we see in that courtroom every single day. So you're in the right place. If you want to follow this case, hit subscribe right now. Amongst the many cases we cover, we got you here on this one. We're paying very close attention to it. And as the trial is about to begin, it's safe to say both sides agree. The prosecution agrees, the defense agrees, Lindsay Clancy killed her three children on January 4th of 2023 That is not a question this trial will answer. It's not a question anyone is even asking. Eighteen jurors are being seated and playing with superior courts to answer a very different question entirely. One that may not have a provable answer.
Did Lindsay Clancy understand what she was doing?
Not whether she did it, whether her mind at the moment she did it was functioning in a way the law can hold accountable. Whether she could appreciate that what she was doing was wrong. Whether she could have stopped herself. Those are the questions. And the honest truth is that no one in that courtroom, not the prosecutors, not the defense attorneys, not the psychiatrist can prove what was happening inside her head on that night. But 18 people are going to be asked to decide anyway. Why don't you play the role of a jerk? Give us your thoughts in the comment section on Substack and YouTube as we discuss this. The links are in the description. The prosecution has a piece of evidence they believe proves Lindsay Clancy was thinking clearly that night. It's a digital trail. And when you hear what it shows, you understand why the defense hasn't been able to shake it. Lindsay Clancy was a labor and delivery nurse at Massachusetts General Hospital. She spent her career helping other mothers bring children into the world. She had three of her own. Cora was five. Dawson was three. Callan was eight months old on January 24th of 23, while her husband Patrick was out picking up takeout and a prescription. Prosecutors allege she strangled all three with exercise bands in their Duxbury, Massachusetts home. She then allegedly cut their wrists, swallowed psychiatric medications and jumped from a second story window. She survived. She's been paralyzed from the waist down ever since, confined to a wheelchair at Duxbury Hospital for more than three years.
Cora and Dawson were pronounced dead that night. Callan held on for three days at Boston Children's Hospital before he died. When Patrick Clancy came home, the house was quiet. The bedroom door was locked. He found Lindsay on the ground between or below the window. Then he found the children. According to prosecutors, each child still had the exercise band tied around their neck. He removed them. He begged them to breathe.
That image is going to sit in the heads of 18 jurors for six to eight weeks.
And both sides know it.
Here's what the prosecution is building.
Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Sprague has described Lindsay Clancy as a methodical killer who executed her children one by one. The cornerstone of that case is a digital trail. Prosecutors allege Lindsay used Apple Maps on her phone to map the route to the restaurant and the pharmacy before texting Patrick to go pick up the order. She allegedly calculated how long he would be gone, how much time she had. And Sprague's framing at the arraignment was direct. The defendant did not take advantage of the situation when her husband left the home that night. She created it. That line is the prosecution's entire theory basically in so many words. She created it.
Layer that on top of it, unsealed court documents show investigators covered her phone, tablets, laptops, exercise bands, a silver knife and prescription medication bottles. Affidavits describe how Lindsay allegedly used her phone and her journal to document her mental state and her feelings about her children. Prosecutors say she also used those devices to research ways to kill. A journal entry reportedly mentioned resenting her two oldest children and wanting to feel love and connection with them. Investigators also found a search asking whether you can treat a sociopath. The jury will hear the 911 call Patrick made after he found the children. Judge William Sullivan has ruled the jury will tour the Clancy home. The witness list runs more than 200 names. Patrick Clancy, the man who lost all three of his children, is expected to be the prosecution's first witness. Patrick Clancy is also on the defense witness list. He's testifying for the defense. He's publicly forgiven his wife. He told the New Yorker in 2024, I wasn't married to a monster. I was married to someone who got sick.