The Pentagon Just Admitted It Needs a New Plan for Iran & Russia's Recruitment Crisis

**SPEAKER_1** (0:00)
Hey, I just Venmo'd you for rent.

**SPEAKER_2** (0:02)
Nice. Now I can instantly spend it whether I'm checking out online with Venmo or using the Venmo debit card.

**Mike Baker** (0:07)
Say more.

**SPEAKER_2** (0:09)
More exactly, because the more you do with Venmo, the more you get, like earning up to 5 percent cash back with Venmo stash on a bundle of brands.

**Mike Baker** (0:16)
So, order more pizza.

**SPEAKER_2** (0:18)
The math demands it.

**SPEAKER_1** (0:19)
Get the Venmo debit card.

**SPEAKER_2** (0:21)
Venmo stash bundle terms and exclusions apply. See terms at venmo.me slash stash terms. Venmo checkout not available at all merchants. Venmo MasterCard is issued by the Bancorp Bank NA.

**Mike Baker** (0:41)
It's Tuesday, the 4th of August. Welcome to The President's Daily Brief. I'm Mike Baker. Your eyes and ears on the world stage. All right. Let's get briefed. First up, what mixed signals from Washington and Tehran leave the fate of the Iran war uncertain? I can't believe we're getting mixed signals about the state of the conflict. That just doesn't sound right. We'll explain why the confusion over peace talks, yet again, may actually reflect a much bigger problem, and that would be the Pentagon is running out of good options. Later in the show, as Russia runs short on volunteers for its war in Ukraine, the Kremlin is turning to increasingly coercive tactics to fill the ranks. We'll explain how Moscow is pressuring more Russians into taking up arms. Plus, President Zelensky is reportedly asking President Trump to convince Elon Musk to expand Starlink's role in Kyiv's efforts to strike deeper into Russia. And in today's Back of the Brief, Michigan, the US state of Michigan, becomes the second state to report cyber attacks targeting its water systems, as the FBI investigates what appears to be a growing threat to America's critical infrastructure.
But first, today's PDB Spotlight.
Depending on whom you believe, the US and Iran are either engaged in urgent and productive negotiations to end the war, or they're not talking at all. As we've already reported, President Trump announced that he had called off what he described as a massive military strike against Iran after what he said were the parameters of a deal beginning to emerge. On Monday, the president doubled down, insisting that talks with Tehran are underway and saying they were requested by Iran, with encouragement from regional partners including Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar. But Iran, well, they tell a very different story. A spokesman for Iran's foreign ministry publicly denied any negotiations with Washington are taking place, insisting there have been no meetings and no American-Iranian talks. Tehran says the only discussions underway are with neighboring Oman over a proposal to safely reopen commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, of course, under Iranian management. Now, those two statements aren't necessarily as contradictory as they sound. Oman has been serving as a back channel between Washington and Tehran over the past many months, reportedly quietly carrying messages between the two sides. So it is possible that discussions are happening in some fashion, just not face to face. Now, aside from whether discussions are actually occurring, the problem for the US is that after months of airstrikes, missile attacks and naval operations, the White House may be reaching the limits of what military pressure can realistically accomplish. That possibility came into sharper focus with new reporting from CNN, which revealed that a senior officer inside US. Central Command recently circulated an email asking military analysts for what he described as, quote, new creative and unconventional ways to pressure and punish Iran, end quote. Well, to be fair, military organizations constantly look for new ideas. That's not new at all. CENTCOM itself pushed back on suggestions that the email reflected frustration, saying innovation has always been part of its planning process. But the timing does matter here. This request comes after months of sustained military operations against Iran, during which American forces have struck missile launchers, air defense systems, Revolutionary Guard facilities, naval assets and military infrastructure across the country. The US has demonstrated that, of course, it can inflict tremendous damage on Iran. What it has not yet demonstrated is that it can force Iran to accept the political outcome that Washington wants.
That is the challenge now confronting the White House.
Despite months of military pressure, Iran has not agreed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. It has not accepted President Trump's demand for what he has described as a total surrender.
While its military capabilities have undoubtedly been degraded, the regime itself remains in power with sufficient capabilities to continue to resist American demands.
That leaves the administration with a narrowing set of choices.
It can continue the current campaign, striking Iranian targets while defending American forces and regional allies, but that risks turning the conflict into a prolonged war of attrition, one in which Iran simply waits for the US to grow tired of the cost or to succumb to domestic political pressures. Washington could also dramatically expand the air campaign. That would, of course, inflict additional damage. But senior military leaders have acknowledged that air power alone is not enough to eliminate Iran's deepest on-the-ground facilities or fundamentally change the regime's calculations. The next option would be even more consequential, introducing American ground forces. That would represent an entirely different war, one carrying enormous military and political and economic risks. And there is little indication that the administration has any appetite to take that step.