The Most Sickening Story the Media Says Doesn’t Exist: First-Hand Account of the White Genocide

Tucker Carlson (0:00)

If you remember the 1980s, you probably remember the Anti-Apartheid Movement, or as it was called in the United States, the Anti-Apartheid Movement. Apartheid was the long-standing system in South Africa in which the minority white population ran the political system. And to some extent, it was a system of separation, where in certain parts of the country, black populations lived in what were called townships, and white populations lived in their own towns. There was a legal separation between the groups. It was a kind of segregation. And as noted, it was long-standing. It went on for many decades. And in the United States, beginning in the 70s and then accelerating into the 1980s, it was extremely unpopular with activists, particularly on college campuses. So if you think about protests against this or that regime that have broken out over the last 20 years on campuses, Pequon, East Timor, Darfur, whatever campus advocates, activists, radicals are mad about, in the 1980s, they were mad about apartheid. And when you went to college campuses, Brown University famously, there were shanty towns on the quad at a lot of schools where kids built mock shanties, hovels, shacks that were supposed to represent the squalor in which the black population of South Africa was living.

Apartheid was hard to defend. It was racial discrimination. There's no question about that. And so over time, the anti-apartheid movement, not just in the United States, but throughout the West, had an effect. And we should note that in the US, political figures did not oppose the college anti-apartheid movement. They endorsed it. They encouraged it. Very much unlike the anti-Israel protests a couple of years ago in college campuses. Nobody went to jail for opposing apartheid on an Ivy League campus. Nobody had his green card pulled or was deported. No, America's ruling class was four square behind the campus protesters. And again, they were protesting something that was very obviously unfair. Racial segregation is unfair always because you don't choose your race.

In any case, in part, due to unrelenting pressure from the United States and Britain and the West generally, apartheid fell in 1994 and it did so peacefully. The white government basically handed over its power in an election. And of course, on the other side was a then very famous figure called Nelson Mandela, who had been a revolutionary. He is spending decades in jail for trying to bomb a train. But by the time 1994 rolled around, he was a figure of reconciliation and peace and power sharing between black and white. And so those elections took place in 1994, and the rest of the world sighed a sigh of relief and pointed to South Africa and said, it's going to work, it's going to be great. And then by and large, the West stopped paying attention to what happened in South Africa, and that intentional aversion of gays has gone on for, well, 32 years now. But what did happen in South Africa? Well, a lot of things and none of them good. The country fell apart economically, and it did not, by the way, become less racist. Over the past 30 years, the government of South Africa, run by the same political party that took power in 1994, the African National Congress, the ANC, has passed almost as many race-specific laws as the apartheid government did, and in some ways is much more brutal. A huge percentage of the white population has left to New Zealand, Australia, the UK, United States and Canada to English-speaking countries around the world. And if you talk to any of them, they left because they felt there was no more opportunity in South Africa because they had the wrong skin color.

Meanwhile, the economy collapsed. Infrastructure collapsed. So what you had in South Africa 32 years later after apartheid was every bit as much racism but a lot less electricity. Probably not a win.

What's interesting, however, is that almost none of the people in the United States and Europe who called for an end to apartheid were willing to admit what had happened, partly because they were implicated in it. South Africa didn't get any better. In fact, it got much worse. And the racism, the one thing that they correctly opposed about apartheid had increased too.

It had just switched sides.

So fast forward from 1994 to May of last year and the White House. This was a part of the Trump term where the president was still trying to make good on his campaign promises before giving up entirely in favor of prosecuting an Iran war. But at the time, last May of 2025, President Trump was doing something he suggested he would do on the campaign trail, and that's say something publicly about anti-white racism, which is widespread, in some cases codified, including in the United States. And in a lot of ways, the only institutional racism that's still allowed in the Western world, and Trump had suggested as he was running for president, he would be the one person brave enough to say something about that, on the grounds that all racism is wrong. Not because it's bad to hurt one group, but because it's bad to hurt any group. It's a universal principle. It applies to everybody.