Topics: News
**Jerm** (0:30)
My name is Jerm, this is Jerm Warfare, The Battle of Ideas. Oliver Janich, thank you for joining me in the trenches.
**Oliver Janich** (0:39)
Thanks for having me. Congratulations to your second child.
**Jerm** (0:42)
Thank you very much. It's been chaotic here at my house the last few days, but we now have two boys.
**Oliver Janich** (0:51)
Yeah, that's good. I also have two boys, so it will get more chaotic even.
**Jerm** (0:55)
That is great. I like to be part of the Old Boys Club.
**Oliver Janich** (1:00)
Yes, me too.
**Jerm** (1:01)
Could you give me a little bit about you, your background?
**Oliver Janich** (1:06)
Well, I started out as a mainstream journalist, and I think the first journalist in the world that wrote in a mainstream magazine, Focus Money, that 9-11 was an inside job. It was a mainstream magazine in Germany.
But then I had to quit there, or I was thrown out, however you say it, but I had a freelancer contract. And from that on, I went much more, much deeper into the topic they now claim are conspiracy theories.
But I started, when I already was in mainstream, I started to notice things, and that almost all you read in the mainstream is wrong. But most of the journalists don't even know that. So when I wrote this 9-11 article, for example, all the other journalists were against me. Only the editor-in-chief was on my side. So it's not always coming from the top, the censorship. It also comes from your colleague. Because I don't know, they don't do their jobs. I mean, everything I write, I have quotes for it and sources. My recent book has 2,200 footnotes, so you can just go in there. And sometimes it's a matter of interpretation. You will see that in that video. But I'm very much committed to the scientific method.
I also learned that in university. I was at, I had the only, how is it called? The only course in Empiric Science while doing my kind of MBA. That was the only university which also taught science, Empirical Science. And one of my main, one of the main guys I followed is Carl Popper. He more or less invented science new, because he says you can never prove a theory, but you can falsify theories. And that's what I'm doing with everything. Political events, murders and so on. I say, okay, can we falsify the official theory? And from there, I decide to go, how did they do it? Possibly, which is harder to prove.
But the first step is always, how can you disprove the official theory? Which is very easy in terms of 9-11. I mean, I'm sure you talked about that also a lot. It's just World Trade Center 7 already falsifies the official theory. And then you can go from there, what really happened. That's what I'm doing with every topic. And just recently, I thought I have to write a book about the Bible because of another book who was given to me by the most prominent, how is it called, news anchor in Germany. She got out of the system, Eva Herrmann, but she is the most prominent person in Germany, 99% recognition rate. And she sent me a book about another interpretation of the Bible. And I just wanted to confirm that this guy is right. Abdur-Rashid is his name in the light of truth. But I was able to do that. But then I found so much more. I said, okay, I have to write it all down.
The official story, what the churches tell us, the mainstream media and the universities are provably wrong. And yeah, and we will talk about that. That's my main thing, just proving things wrong.
**Jerm** (4:26)
That should be the way in which science is conducted. If you look at the way science these days, and I say science in inverted commas, it seems to be very dogmatic.
**Oliver Janich** (4:41)
Absolutely, I mean, what we see today has nothing to do with science, really nothing. I mean, there was even a study, I think, that over 50% of all science papers don't really, if they are peer-reviewed, do not confirm what they say. And of course, there's a lot of interests in science. For example, in climate science, which is not science at all, there are a lot of people profiting from that system. It's ridiculous. We could talk one hour about that, but I'm sure you had that topic already.
So they have a vested interest, and especially in Germany, but also in other countries, it's the government who pays the scientists. There's this one problem, so they have an ideology, or it's the big corporations who want to sell their products, like the pharma products. It has nothing to do with science, but the good thing is you can look into the papers, and many of them more or less admit that this is only an estimation. So if you look deeper into it, but you see that, but in the mainstream media, they make a headline out of it, and that's not really what the science says. So it's complicated, but it's not so difficult to disprove things, they claim, but they just have the interest to push a narrative. And the narrative is more or less always the same.
45 more minutes of transcript below
Thousands of transcripts fetched by people building searchable podcast archives
Try it now — copy, paste, done:
curl -H "x-api-key: pt_demo" \
https://spoken.md/transcripts/1000651996090
Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and any agent that makes HTTP calls.
From $0.10 per transcript. No subscription. Credits never expire. Prices exclude VAT, added at checkout for EU customers. Not what you expected? Email us within 14 days with 20 or fewer credits used and we refund the pack in full.
Using your own key:
curl -H "x-api-key: YOUR_KEY" \
https://spoken.md/transcripts/YOUR_EPISODE_ID