Jensen Said This Company Will Be Worth $1 Trillion! Is That Even Legal? artwork

Jensen Said This Company Will Be Worth $1 Trillion! Is That Even Legal?

Earn Your Leisure

June 14, 2026

Subscribe and watch more videos here: https://www.youtube.com/@EarnYourLeisure Join the EYL community for deeper training and a more detailed approach:https://www.eyluniversity.com Join the number one stock club in the world:https://www.ianinvest.
Speakers: Rashad
**SPEAKER_1** (0:00)
What's the difference between if he's the...
That's why the word suspicious, I wasn't really sure, because Jensen is, he's manipulating the market. I hate to say it like that, because, you know, we...

**SPEAKER_2** (0:10)
It's different, it's different.

**Rashad** (0:12)
He's actually investing into those companies.

**SPEAKER_1** (0:14)
Exactly.

**Rashad** (0:14)
He's not selling them.

**SPEAKER_1** (0:16)
But if you invest in a company and you say, this company, he knows the type of power he has. If you say, this company is gonna be the next... Manipulation is not necessarily a bad word. It's not like an illegal word, but he is manipulating the market. If you say, okay, this will be the next $2 billion. If you invest in a company, $2 billion into a company, and you say, this company will be, not it may be, not it might be, because even as us, as a financial journalist, when we write stories, we'll say could, maybe, potentially.
As financial journalists, we have liability if we say, Apple will double in two weeks. Apple will be worth $10 trillion. We should not say that.

**SPEAKER_2** (1:02)
Yeah, you better get your ENO insurance.

**SPEAKER_1** (1:05)
So, for you guys, when you're listening, if you're building your blogs, or you're building your platform, it's better to say Apple could, potentially, has the ability to. He said this will be the next trillion dollar company.

**SPEAKER_2** (1:21)
So you're saying what's the difference between him and Trump?

**SPEAKER_1** (1:23)
Exactly.

**Rashad** (1:24)
Oh, him and Trump, I thought you were talking about him and.

**SPEAKER_1** (1:26)
But everybody's doing this, though. This is the era, this is Trump era, this is Trump era, everybody's doing this.

**Rashad** (1:33)
Trump is saying it, right? Like, obviously, he has information. I think the biggest difference with Jensen is that he's invested in it, and those companies will help benefit his company. And so, yeah, saying that they'll be the next trillion dollar company is gonna help boost his company to potentially.

**SPEAKER_1** (1:47)
Exactly.

**Rashad** (1:47)
Yeah, but he's also invested in it.

**SPEAKER_1** (1:51)
But no, it doesn't matter, though. I could be invested in Apple myself if Earn Your Leisure has influence. Or even a penny stock. That's even easier to move.

**SPEAKER_2** (2:00)
Yeah, we can't do it.

**SPEAKER_1** (2:01)
We could pick a penny stock and say, look, this is the next micron. We could move a penny stock.

**SPEAKER_2** (2:08)
We'll be in court.

**SPEAKER_1** (2:10)
But we could, exactly. But we can say, hey, we're invested in it. We believe in the company, but we're using our platform. We're using our influence to move something so we can make money.

**Rashad** (2:20)
All right, now, so here's the difference.

**SPEAKER_2** (2:22)
Here's the difference, real quick. Yeah.
Jensen has a, Rashad, you're right, but the difference between Trump, Trump has too many failed ventures, and there's a question of character. Now, you can argue with Jensen.
Maybe he has some of the same character flaws that just haven't been revealed in public, because we can talk about the character of a person and the caricature of a person, right? But he has no losses on his jacket. And also, Jensen is so valuable geopolitically, he can almost do no harm. He's kind of like Jordan in the 90s NBA, where a lot of things are going to be circumvented, and it's okay if he did it versus if someone else did it. And also, you can argue, Troy, I'll let you go.

**Rashad** (3:13)
Yeah.

**SPEAKER_2** (3:13)
Trump is invested in these two.

**SPEAKER_1** (3:16)
Exactly.

**SPEAKER_2** (3:17)
Just through other proxies.

**Rashad** (3:18)
Yes.

**SPEAKER_2** (3:19)
So as they're building this.

**SPEAKER_1** (3:21)
Or directly.

**Rashad** (3:23)
So now.

**SPEAKER_1** (3:24)
You've seen his trades that he did. He did 3,000 trades last year.

**Rashad** (3:27)
A lot of them are what Jensen has said, right? So that goes back to the point where we made that post, where I'm like, yo, listen to what Jensen's saying.

**SPEAKER_2** (3:33)
Yeah, yeah.

**Rashad** (3:33)
Because he's the guy in the arena. When we're talking about AI, we're talking about the ecosystem. He's the guy. He's the guy on the floor. He has the front row seat. He can tell you that's going to move. Why? Number one, we're investing in it. But guess what? I'm not their only customer.

**SPEAKER_2** (3:50)
Yeah.

**Rashad** (3:51)
So is that company. So is that company. And if we're investing in it and we see the expansion, we see the demand. Oh, if we're ordering this much. And for those who don't know what Marvel does, they design networking.

**SPEAKER_2** (4:03)
Yeah.

**Rashad** (4:03)
Custom ASICS is really the sweet point for them, which is why when I was looking at them and I'm looking at Broadcom, similar, they have some differences. But I'm like, custom, custom, custom. If we're listening to GPUs and we're listening to the TPUs, which Google is doing, who's building the custom? Broadcom partners with Google.

4 more minutes of transcript below

Feed this to your agent

Try it now — copy, paste, done:

curl -H "x-api-key: pt_demo" \
  https://spoken.md/transcripts/1000651996090

Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and any agent that makes HTTP calls.

From $0.10 per transcript. No subscription. Credits never expire.

Using your own key:

curl -H "x-api-key: YOUR_KEY" \
  https://spoken.md/transcripts/1000772654623