Ep. 1850 - New Evidence in the Cornell 7 Case Completely Blows The Accuser's Story

Matt Walsh (0:00)

Now, we've all heard the radio ads about owing the IRS money. They try to scare you and frighten you in the calling. Well, tax relief advocates is different. If you owe the IRS 5,000, 50,000 or 500,000, TRA has a solution to resolve your tax problem. Don't lose hope. TRA could reduce or even eliminate what you owe. Their passion is taxes and helping regular people and businesses fix their IRS mess. They have over 1,000 five-star Google reviews and an A plus with the Better Business Bureau. You don't have to be afraid of the IRS anymore. Real tax relief programs are available that can give you a fresh start. So don't wait. Go to tra.com. It's tra.com or call 800-575-1753.

Again, that's 800-575-1753.

Tax relief advocates, real solutions for real people. A slew of text messages from the Cornell accuser have now been released and they erase all doubt about what happened. This woman, according to her own contemporaneous statements, consented to deviant sexual activity in a frat house. And after the fact, she firmly believed that no crime had been committed. She even stated that, quote, Everyone needs to grow up because sexuality and sex is changing, meaning that she saw her behavior as enlightened, as a feminist expression of her own freedom and empowerment. And then not long afterwards, she began experiencing shame and humiliation when the entire campus found out about what she did. She stated her reputation was destroyed and accused a fraternity member of telling everyone what she had done. And the breaking point came, apparently, when the fraternity disinvited her from their big Halloween party. This was the single most important social event of the semester. There's nothing more important to a college girl than the Halloween party. And they made it very clear that they didn't want her to attend. And she, you know, suddenly hearing this, she decided that she had been assaulted, retroactively withdrawing her consent long after the fact. That was the moment when she decided that she would go scorched earth. The second she was barred from a party at the very fraternity house where she supposedly was abused. So think about that for a second. She was bitterly disappointed that she couldn't return to the place where she was supposedly subjected to a brutal gang rape. Now, the very notion is farcical, of course, but she understood that at a left-wing female dominated campus like Cornell, she could immediately regain the moral high ground if she lied about what happened. Even if her story made no sense. And she was right. We'll go into the text messages and the whole timeline in just a moment. This is a case where facts matter, as they always do. And we're going to show all the text messages in context to demonstrate that this woman is a liar. The evidence is not a dispute. No one can seriously take issue with any of it. But first, it's important to establish at the outset that this case is not about one trashy woman at Cornell or the male students who also engaged in depraved sex acts and drug use. And it's not simply about due process and the seemingly non-existent rights of the accused, although that's obviously a really important part of the story. This woman is almost certainly going to be paid millions of dollars as a result of the con her lawyers are running. The male students lives will be destroyed and we can expect a host of allegations in the coming months and years as a result. That's the expected outcome at this point. And we shouldn't pretend otherwise, everybody knows it. The more interesting question is why this woman's story, as fantastical and self-contradictory as it is, has resonated to such a great extent on the left with so many women all over the country. Democrat politicians are falling over themselves to make this case into a campaign issue, not because they have any principles, but because they're responding to the frenzy that their female constituents in the Democrat Party are participating in. It's supply and demand. There's a whole TikTok trend right now where women claimed to have been the victims of some horrible crime many years after it supposedly happened. And why is this happening? Why did the accuser abruptly decide that she had been assaulted? And why are so many women defending her? Even after it's clear that she's lying. What we're seeing here is among other things, the failure of the left's consent-based morality. So they've chipped away at all sexual morals for decades. They've systematically eliminated every moral rule and standard governing, well, governing human behavior in general, but especially governing human sexuality. And they have left consent as the only remaining rule, the only remaining principle. But you know, it turns out that sex can be degrading and bad even when it's consensual. And when that happens, when a woman feels gross and sad and embarrassed after a sexual encounter, even when it was fully consensual, they have no moral language to even understand or talk about how they feel except through consent. You know, they can't say that sex outside of marriage is bad or that degrading group sex is bad or that drunkenness and intoxication are bad. And that's why they feel bad. They can't say any of that stuff on the left, because on the left are supposed to celebrate all of that.