Economists Make the Case For and Against California’s Billionaire Tax
KQED's Forum
September 14, 2026
California voters will decide this fall whether the state should impose a one-time 5 percent tax on billionaires, with much of the revenue going toward health care amid federal funding cuts.
Speakers Alexis Madrigal, Gabriel Zucman, Joshua Rauh
TopicsPoliticsNewsNews Commentary
SPEAKER_2 (0:03)
College football is back, so Hilton called on me, the superstition concierge, to make your fan rituals a reality. Need a room to match your lucky number? We got you. Want to make sure our team doesn't wash your lucky jersey? Oh, that smells lucky.
Hilton's unmatched hospitality can keep up with any superstition. Even a marching band wake up call at 555 and 55 seconds. Hit it. When you need a team that will do whatever it takes on game day, it matters where you stay. Hilton, for the stay.
SPEAKER_3 (0:34)
This episode is brought to you by Palmolive. Family time isn't just the big moments. It's weeknight dinners, sitting around the table, everyone talking all at once. So when the plates are empty and the sink is full, use Palmolive Ultra. Palmolive's most powerful formula removes up to 99.9% of grease, leaving your dishes sparkling clean. And the new convenient pump makes cleaning even easier, so you can spend less time tackling dishes and more time together. Shop now at palmolive.com.
SPEAKER_1 (1:05)
This episode is brought to you by State Farm. Listening to this podcast instead of doom scrolling? Smart move. Another smart move? Getting help from one of State Farm's 19,000 local agents when you choose to bundle home and auto. Bundling. Just another way to save with the personal price plan. Prices are based on rating plans that vary by state. Coverage options are selected by the customer. Availability, amount of discounts and savings, and eligibility vary by state.
Alexis Madrigal (1:31)
Welcome to Forum. I'm Alexis Madrigal. Proposition 40 is one of the most contentious and intriguing propositions of recent years. It's a one-time 5 percent wealth tax on billionaires. It would raise a substantial amount of money, though there are questions about how much net revenue it could pour into state coffers, and those dollars would mostly be used to fund health care.
Our first guest is Gabriel Zucman. He is a UC Berkeley economist and author of the admirably straightforwardly named book, We Need to Tax Billionaires. He helped to develop the proposition. Welcome Gabriel.
Gabriel Zucman (2:06)
Thanks for having me.
Alexis Madrigal (2:07)
Our second guest is Joshua Rauh, an economist and professor at Stanford Graduate School of Business. He authored a study about the potential effects of the wealth tax and has emerged as perhaps the leading economist voice opposing Prop 40 Welcome, Josh.
Joshua Rauh (2:22)
Good to be in the show.
Alexis Madrigal (2:24)
Okay, you guys ready? Ready to fight?
Gabriel, let's start with you. You did help develop this proposition. Let's just start with the basics. What's the measure due? Who's subject to the tax? Where's the money go?
Gabriel Zucman (2:39)
This would be a one-time tax on billionaires. Only people who have more than $1 billion of net wealth would be affected. We're talking about roughly 250 people in California, mostly Silicon Valley tech billionaires, who would have to pay a one-time tax equal to 5 percent of their wealth. For context, their wealth has grown by 170 percent since 2023, and they would have to pay just 5 percent. We can expect about $100 billion in tax revenue for the state with this tax.
90 percent of the money would go to health care, and California needs this money, because the big budget bill that was passed last year by Congress has defended Medicaid. And if nothing is done, 2 million people in California are going to lose their health insurance. The fraction of uninsured individuals will increase from 6 percent to 10 percent.
The California governor, Gavin Newsom, or the California legislature haven't proposed any solution, so voters can solve this problem by themselves with Prop 40
Alexis Madrigal (4:12)
I'm curious, just like, is this for you primarily a fiscal measure about the state's budget, or is it more of a moral one about the way that you think the state should be approaching billionaire wealth?
Gabriel Zucman (4:25)
Well, it is a budget fiscal issue.
There's a major shortfall of revenue for Medicaid, and the question is, where do we find the money? Now, you have essentially two big levers. There is the California income tax, and there is this potential wealth tax on billionaires. What's really important to understand is this. When I first realized that, it blew my mind. If you look at the total wealth of California's 250 billionaires, we're talking about $2.3 trillion today, this is as big as the total income of all Californian families. Their total taxable income, AGI, is also $2.3 trillion.
So essentially, if you want to get $100 billion in revenue for the state, you can do it in two ways, either with a 5% tax on the wealth of 250 billionaires, or with an increase in the income tax of 5% points for all Californian taxpayers.
40 more minutes of transcript below
Thousands of transcripts fetched by people building searchable podcast archives
Fetch the whole transcript
The demo key returns a sample episode in full, no card needed:
curl -H "x-api-key: pt_demo" \
https://spoken.md/transcripts/1000651996090Markdown with the speakers named, for your notes, your knowledge base, or anything that makes HTTP calls.
From $0.10 per transcript. No subscription. Credits never expire. Prices exclude VAT, added at checkout for EU customers. Not what you expected? Email us within 14 days with 20 or fewer credits used and we refund the pack in full.
Using your own key:
curl -H "x-api-key: YOUR_KEY" \
https://spoken.md/transcripts/1000789609879