Can Bryan Kohberger Really Take His Guilty Plea Back?

**SPEAKER_1** (0:00)
This is Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski. Here now, Tony Brueski.

**Tony Brueski** (0:07)
Bryan Kohberger picked up a phone. That's the event. That's the entire thing. A man serving four consecutive life terms in segregated housing in Idaho's Maximum Security Prison south of Boise, got himself to a phone, called a reporter at the New York Times and explained why he was finally speaking up. His words, why am I breaking my silence? A lot went wrong in those plea discussions. I really want to be heard. He really does want to be heard. Oh, poor little bry. Are you getting bored there in prison? Is it not the wonderful place you thought it would be when you thought, I'm going to go and try and do this horrible crime and get away with it. And it failed and I get to take the ride in the prison system and die there. Sorry. Sorry. The arrogance, the narcissism, the delusions of this pathetic blob of human flesh are really stunning at this point. Thirteen months of silence.
Four dad's college students, a guilty plea. He entered himself out loud in a court room four separate times. And the message he sat on for over a year and then delivered to one of the biggest newspapers in the country is that he'd like some attention, please. There's paperwork attached to it, a petition. He wrote himself. He's his own attorney now because he's attacking Ann Taylor, his old attorney. Oh, wouldn't it be fun if Ann Taylor came out and said some shit, talked about what it was like representing that thing. A petition for post conviction relief entered July 27th of 2026 in Ada County District Court. According to the docket, he filed it himself, no attorney and his handwriting on the original document looks like that of a serial killer. Gee, I wonder why. And in his statement, he went ahead. I mean, you would think like, that's just kind of the funny part. You know, there's jokes about that, about, oh, your writing looks like a serial killer. He made no effort to not make his writing look like a serial killer. This is me telling you I'm not a serial killer while writing like a serial killer, while talking like one.
But I mean, that's, I guess that's kind of the symptom. That's part of the behavior of someone who is a serial killer. They're not quite aware how much the rest of the world is aware of their tells. And Bryan, as we know, wasn't one to read the room, just little in cell brye.
According to the docket, he filed it himself, no attorney. And in his statement, he went ahead and invited prosecutors to come after the death penalty all over again. Bryan, the case is over. Nobody's coming after you to chase you. It's because you phone a reporter and go, come get me. Hey, dipshit, they already got you.
They don't need to do anything. You've been gotten.
Full stop.
It's laughable. Put the death penalty back on the table. Now, seems you're suffering more alive.
Go on now.
Dinner is coming soon. Go back to your cage, little boy. Go back to your cage.
No one's coming to get you. You pathetic waste of DNA material.
Your organs should be harvested for people who need them. Your flesh should be cut and used for radical reconstructive plastic surgery for burn victims, leaving nothing but your skeletal remains in a cell which roaches can feast on. Or the cannibal, next to one of the Tate brothers.
They can feed him too. I mean, let's cut him up and put him right next to you. I'm totally cool with putting a Tate brother in a cell with you, and let you two just kind of duke it out until you're done. And till both of you are dead. But I digress.
Tell us how you really feel, Tony.
Inviting prosecutors to come after you, come after you with a death penalty. It sounds enormous right until you remember that saying it costs him nothing. Nobody is refiling capital charges because a man in solitary confinement sent out a press release. It's like you studied criminology. You studied how this shit works. Do you? Oh, my God.
There is one sentence he said in July 25, under oath with the judge looking right at him. He's the only witness to it. And the reason all of this goes nowhere. Kaylee Goncalves was 21, Madison, Mogen, 21, Xana Kernodle, 20, Ethan Chapin, 20, three roommates, and Kernodle's boyfriend is in an off-campus house in Moscow, Idaho in the early hours of November 13, 2022 That's where it all happened. Two other students were in that house and were not harmed. I'm not here to go over the whole crime again. Kohberger was a criminology Ph.D. student at Washington State University. About 20 minutes across the state line in Pullman, investigators arrested him nearly seven weeks later after using genetic genealogy to work backwards to his name. The evidence is the reason nobody in Idaho is nervous. A white Hyundai Elantra matching the one caught on security footage near the house, a phone that left his home and went dark for a window that mattered, an Amazon account showing he'd got a K-Bar knife and sheath months earlier, and the sheath itself left behind at the scene carrying his DNA. That's the body of evidence he now calls a work of fiction. On July 2nd, 2025, in Ada County, he stood in front of a judge, Stephen Hippler, and answered a series of questions with the words yes. Then he said guilty four times, once for each of them, as their names were read into the room. Judge Hippler gave him four consecutive life sentences on the murder counts and the maximum ten years on the burglary. He was never required to explain why he did it. He didn't have the plea. He didn't have sentencing. He hasn't in 13 months since. And he didn't in the statement. His family passed along. So read what he actually wrote, not the headline about it, the actual words. Circumnavigated by a broken plea. He wanted to get that book title in there of the author who doesn't know shit that wrote about it. In my opinion. The trial never provided the public the clarity conductive to closure. He's using big words because it makes him feel like he's a big person with his micro penis. And justice shall remain abjectly miscarried unless that plea is withdrawn. It's not a legal argument. That's a man who found a thesaurus. A real ineffective assistance claim is boring. Structurally, deliberately boring. It names a specific advice that was wrong. It attaches a date to it. It says on this day, my attorney told me this exact thing. It was false. And here is a sworn affidavit backing it up. It's a document built for one reader, a judge who has seen a thousand of them and can spot a real one inside four paragraphs. His has adjectives, myopic, abjectly blatant. He called the state's view of the case myopic and a work of fiction. He wrote that justice was circumnavigated. Nobody circumnavigates justice.