SCOTUS Birthright Citizenship Ruling, Trump's Crypto Payday, AI Fails at Ford | PBD Podcast #826

**Patrick Bet-David** (0:12)
The future looks bright. My handshake is better than anything I ever saw.

**SPEAKER_3** (0:16)
It's right here.

**SPEAKER_4** (0:20)
I don't think I've ever said this before.

**Patrick Bet-David** (0:27)
So we got a lot of stories to go through today, but I want to start off with one right off the bat, and this is the ruling that they had with Supreme Court yesterday for birthright citizenship. And I want to share a pattern with you. And you tell me if you're concerned about this or not. So if we look at these stories that we have yesterday with the birthright citizenship where the president comes out and tweets and says, Congratulations to China. This was a very big victory for China. And a lot of people are like, Well, that's not funny. That's not this. But maybe it is. Let's look at this even bigger than that, because there's a lot of things that went his way. There's a lot of things that he won. But the Democrats thought automatically when he got Neil Gorsuch appointed on April 10th, 2017, that this was it. Then when he got Brett Kavanaugh on October 6th, 2018 Oh, my God. Then we got Amy Coney Barrett.
They're going to rule everything in his favor. 100% of the time, they're going to rule in his favor. It's going to be like, hey, just a stamp, rubber stamp. Just go ahead. He's going to get everything that he wants.
And I'm going to show you a pattern. And you tell me whose track record of being able to reason and say, I don't know, I don't know. And who is, nope, no matter what, I'm siding this way. So, if we go from the beginning till today, remember when Amy Coney Barrett was sworn in, she got in, a month later, they were trying to get the Texas lawsuit challenging the 2020 election. Do you know all three Trump appointees declined to block or overturn the certified election? He gave them the jobs, they voted against them. They're like, nope, we're not doing this.
All right, I guess this, you know, court packing stuff doesn't work. Then when you go look at the couple different things that just happened recently, the losses, the birthright citizenship 6-3, look at the patterns. All three leftists ruled against them. Now keep in mind, when we look at the conservatives that we have in Supreme Court, what names do we have of those that are in the Supreme Court that are conservatives? Tom, can you give all the names? So we have Roberts, we have Clarence Thomas, Coney Barrett, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and you look at the left, Katanji Jackson, Kagan, and we have Sotomayor, right?

**Tom Ellsworth** (2:44)
And Alito.

**SPEAKER_6** (2:44)
Don't forget, yeah, Alito.

**Patrick Bet-David** (2:45)
Alito. So watch this pattern. Trump versus Barbara, critical loss, okay? Democrats voted against it, no problem, 3-0. Let's see if they have the ability to reason.
Policy and institutional wins, Little versus Cox, this is in Hecox and West Virginia, 6-3 decision affirming that states have full constitutional authority to restrict schools and colleges, sports teams, based strictly on biological sex.
This is men not competing with women's sports. You would assume everybody voted and said, yeah, this is common sense, nope. The three Democrats all voted with the Democratic position. Let me keep going.
Wilford against Lopez, 6-3, decision striking down Hawaii's vampire rule that banned concealed carry permit holders from entering private businesses without an explicit posted invitation. All three Democrats against it. NRSC against FEC, 6-3 decision striking down federal limits on how much national political parties can spend in direct coordination with their candidates, 6-3. This one, we may not even be Ford. I don't even know if that's a good idea because I want money out of politics. This brings more money into politics, right?

**Tom Ellsworth** (3:54)
That's bad for small independent candidates.

**Patrick Bet-David** (3:55)
It is, it is. So Blanche versus Lau, another 6-3, Democrats against it. When you go E. Jean Carroll, all 3 Democrats voted.
He lost, I think he has to pay like $5 million. Federal Reserve of Independence, 5-4, all Democrats against it. Election Logistics, all Democrats against it. If you look at one pattern, this is what you'll notice. You will notice there has never ever been a time where Democrats sided with Trump, but there's been many, many instances where conservative judges sided with Democrats. So what does this mean?
A lot of people would even say Trump had a pretty good record with the Supreme Court. A lot of things got done. Roe, the whole Dobbs with Roe v. Wade, and that was a big thing that he got done. Affirmative action, that was a big thing that he got done. So hey, the executive power got a lot stronger. But that's not what I want to talk about with this. It's long term. What happens if this is 6-3 the other way around?