Mornings with Mark Duffield FULL SHOW!! (24.06.2026)

**SPEAKER_1** (0:01)
This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required compatibility and availability varies 18 plus.

**Mark Duffield** (0:26)
Hello, everyone. Welcome to the SEN WA Radio Studio. We're out here at Optus Stadium on this Wednesday morning in Perth. We're here thanks to Beaumont Homes award winning design, built to be loved forever. It's going to be sunny in Perth today, a top of 21 degrees, made in WA for WA. This is Mornings with Mark Duffield on SEN WA.
So the AFL has moved to stop criticism of its umpires, telling club CEOs at their conference on the Gold Coast that while it might have let Gold Coast coach Damian Hardwick off with a fine for his critique of or without a fine, sorry, for his critique of the umps in the game against Geelong at GM HBA Stadium recently, and while North Melbourne's Jai Simpkin might have been warned and excused for his social media rant about Paul Curtis's 3-3 match ban for the dangerous tackle on Eagle Hamish-Davis, the next offender up is going to get pinged. This, of course, is typical of the AFL. It has had rules in place to punish the likes of Hardwick and Simpkin all along. It even fined Nisai Awangani-Miller for a half-hearted bird flipped at an abusive fan last weekend.
But why the AFL didn't fine Hardwick as anyone's guess when it comes to questioning officialdom, this was a long way from his first rodeo and he's admitted himself he's not a good loser. But there is an underlying issue here and a robust conversation, which has been simmering all year, has now broken out about the standard of umpiring currently on offer in the AFL. So our respected colleague, Jared Waitley, lit a fire under this on Monday when he publicly doubted that the AFL had enough umpires with the professional competence to umpire at AFL level to maintain its four umpire system at the moment. Now we all respect Jared and his command of the English language and his usually balanced takes on the game, but the words professional competence, I have to say concern me, they wreaked of a disrespect towards umpires who have the toughest job in footy.
On this show yesterday, former umpire Dean Margetts echoed some of Jared's concerns about the umpiring standard. But he also hinted that if we return to a three umpire system, which is what Jared was calling for, a number of the game's oldest, most respected and best umpires would be forced out of the game because athletically they would not cope with the extra physical demands of the AFL game in a three-amp system. For example, two of the game's best, Brett Roseberry and Matt Stevick, are both 46 years old. Now, former ump Ray Chamberlain estimated in a robust but respectful debate with Jared on Fox Footy's AFL 360 last night that eight of the game's top 12 umps would retire if the game returned to a three umpire system. Now, the two decisions that have become the poster children for the standard of umpiring at the moment came in the GWS Carlton game at the weekend. So, Jadon Laverde executed a spoil on blue Frank the Tank Evans. The ball ricocheted to Finn Callaghan and the umpire signalled a mark to Callaghan. Now, what I suspect happened is that the ump was on the verge of either paying the mark to Evans before the spoil or on the verge of paying interference to Evans from Laverde and then decided it was play on and messed up his whistle blowing and his signalling. It perhaps should have been a free to Evans, but if it wasn't, the actual outcome wasn't changed by the mess up. Callahan simply played on. Then there was Callahan's attempted tackle on Patty Cripps. Cripps went to ground after fending off. The tackle didn't stick, but Callahan got a holding the ball free anyway. It's a clear error.
But here is a thought that might make the umpiring better.
A four-word thought.
Stop changing the rules.
Holding the ball or prior opportunity has been a dog's breakfast all year. The stand rule and where 50m penalty should and shouldn't apply is confusing for players, so there is no reason to think it shouldn't be confusing for umpires as well. The cross the line at the centre ball up and concede a free even if the opposing ruck has stuged you, a la Brody Grundy, has infuriated us all at times throughout the season.