Epic Adventure Unveiled: The Man Who Would Be King (1975) Review

Simon (0:00)

Let's talk about The Man Who Would Be King.

The Man Who Would Be King, directed by John Huston, is a captivating adaptation of Rudyard Kipling's short story. Released in 1975, this film is a thrilling blend of drama, adventure and war set against the backdrop of British-ruled India. The story follows two ex-soldiers, Daniel Dravet, played by Sean Connery, and Pichi Karnahan, portrayed by Michael Caine, who embark on an audacious journey to Kafiristan, a remote region in Afghanistan with dreams of becoming kings. Huston's film is a swashbuckling adventure that harkens back to the golden age of Hollywood action films. It is reminiscent of classics like Gunga Din and The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, another Huston masterpiece. The film is filled with excitement, humour and strong characterisations, making it a delightful watch. The chemistry between Connery and Caine is electric, and their camaraderie is a joy to behold. They bring to life the larger-than-life characters of Dravet and Karnahan, two men driven by greed and ambition, yet bound by a deep friendship.

The film's narrative is framed by the character of Rudyard Kipling, played by Christopher Plummer, who serves as both a participant and a chronicler of the tale. Kipling's presence adds a layer of authenticity and historical context to the story. The film explores themes of hubris and the folly of imperialism, as Dravet and Karnahan's quest for power ultimately leads to their downfall. Their journey is fraught with danger, from treacherous mountain passes to hostile tribes, yet they remain undeterred in their pursuit of glory. Houston's direction is masterful, capturing the sweeping landscapes and exotic locales with a keen eye for detail. The film's cinematography, by Oswald Morris, is stunning, and Maurice Jarre's score adds to the film's epic feel. The screenplay, co-written by Houston and Gladys Hill, stays true to Kipling's original story while infusing it with humour and wit. However, the film is not without its flaws. Some critics have noted its portrayal of the local people as simplistic and stereotypical, a reflection of the colonial attitudes of the time. The film's emphasis on Freemasonry and its portrayal of Kipling as a character are also points of contention, yet these elements do not detract from the film's overall impact. The Man Who Would Be King is a classic adventure film that combines thrilling action with a poignant exploration of friendship and ambition. It is a testament to Huston's enduring talent as a filmmaker and the timeless appeal of Kipling storytelling. Despite its dated elements, the film remains a captivating and entertaining watch, a reminder of a bygone era of filmmaking.

Well, that's my review of The Man Who Would Be King, and I'm giving it four stars out of a possible five stars.

Thanks for listening. If you enjoyed what you've heard, please like, subscribe, and I'll see you next time.