Does Antimatter Explain Why There's Something Rather Than Nothing? artwork

Does Antimatter Explain Why There's Something Rather Than Nothing?

PBS Space Time

July 23, 2026

PBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to: http://to.pbs.org/DonateSPACE ↓ More info below ↓ Sign Up on Patreon to get access to the Space Time Discord! https://www.patreon.com/pbsspacetime Check out the Space Time Merch Store https://pbsspacetime.
Speakers: Matt O'Dowd, Ryan Reynolds
**SPEAKER_1** (0:00)
This episode is brought to you by Accenture. When you're advertising operations fall out of sync, everything else follows. Spotify and Accenture are working together to reinvent the rhythm of ad sales. Using automation, analytics, and smarter workflows to simplify campaign delivery and access better data across the business. The result? Less time spent on operations, more time connecting brands with the moments and fandoms that matter most. Learn more at accenture.com/spotify.

**SPEAKER_2** (0:31)
This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required compatibility and availability varies 18 plus.

**Matt O'Dowd** (0:56)
The most precious substance in our universe is not gold, nor oil. It's not even printer ink. It's antimatter. But it's worth every penny of its very high cost, because it may hold the answer to the question of why anything exists in our universe at all.
Each particle in our universe has its exact counterpart. An antiparticle. Identical in every way, but with the opposite charge and spin. An electron has a positron, a proton has an antiproton, and so on.
And when a particle encounters its antiparticle partner, when matter encounters antimatter, the two can pair annihilate, canceling each other out completely, and leaving only two photons to carry away their energy. And it works in reverse too. Particle and antiparticle pairs can be created from pure radiation. In fact, that's how we think the first particles were created in the very early universe. But if matter and antimatter are always created in pairs, then in the beginning of time there should have been exactly the same amount of both. So where is all of the antimatter?
The better question is, why is there any matter at all? Shouldn't everything just have annihilated again, leaving only a vacuum bathed in light? The most likely answer seems to be that the universe started out with a little more matter compared to antimatter. If there were slightly more particles than antiparticles, then almost everything would have annihilated, leaving the universe full of photons, and only very few particles that couldn't find an annihilation partner.
These days there are around a billion times more photons than there are particles of matter, so we estimate that for every billion particles of matter that annihilated, only one survived. And there's the mystery. Why were particles created with that one in a billion overabundance compared to antiparticles? It seems there must be something inherently different in the way the universe interacts with particles versus antiparticles. The universe must not treat the two symmetrically. Indeed, many physicists think that the answer lies in the fundamental symmetries of the universe, or, rather, in the breaking of these symmetries. We've discussed this before. There are three symmetries of the universe that physicists once believed were fundamental. You should be able to perform any of these transformations, or all of them, and the laws of physics should be unchanged. We have charge conjugation, where positive and negative charges are swapped. We have parity inversion, where the universe is reflected through a mirror. And time reversal, where all particles have their direction of motion and spins exactly reversed. If you apply all three of these transformations to a particle, if you apply a CPT transformation, then With the under $3 menu of McDonald's, a McChicken is only $2.

**SPEAKER_4** (3:59)
It turns out that being the hero of your cousin only costs you $2.
For a McChicken, good deal. Only for a limited time. Prices and participation can vary. Prices with delivery can be higher.

**SPEAKER_2** (4:11)
Tomorrow morning is knocking.

**SPEAKER_5** (4:13)
Stock your fridge now. How about a creamy mocha frappuccino drink?

**SPEAKER_2** (4:16)
Or a sweet vanilla?

**SPEAKER_6** (4:17)
Smooth caramel, maybe?

**SPEAKER_2** (4:19)
Or a white chocolate mocha?

**SPEAKER_6** (4:20)
Whichever you choose, delicious coffee awaits.

**SPEAKER_2** (4:23)
Find Starbucks frappuccino drinks wherever you buy your groceries.

**Matt O'Dowd** (4:26)
It becomes its own antiparticle. Because we expect the universe to be CPT symmetric, we expect it to treat antimatter in exactly the same way as regular matter. But one by one, these presumed symmetries failed. The first to fall was parity, with Chiangchung Wu's famous Cobalt 60 experiment proving that a mirror image of our universe would be distinguishable from our own. Then charge and parity combined, or CP, also fell, with the observation of the peculiarity in the decay of K-mesons.

9 more minutes of transcript below

Feed this to your agent

Try it now — copy, paste, done:

curl -H "x-api-key: pt_demo" \
  https://spoken.md/transcripts/1000651996090

Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and any agent that makes HTTP calls.

From $0.10 per transcript. No subscription. Credits never expire.

Using your own key:

curl -H "x-api-key: YOUR_KEY" \
  https://spoken.md/transcripts/1000778034761