Daily Crypto Deep Dive: Bitcoin to $113K? Citi’s New Target Explained

SPEAKER_1 (0:00)

Welcome back to the Daily Crypto Deep Dive. Citigroup has just raised its 12-month Bitcoin price target to $113,000.

And at first glance, that sounds like another big bullish Wall Street prediction. Bitcoin is trading around $85,000 as we record this, so Citi is effectively saying there could be roughly another 33% upside from here. But today, I don't want to simply tell you that a massive bank thinks Bitcoin is going to expire, I want to do something much more useful. We're going to pull the prediction apart and ask what would actually have to happen for Bitcoin to reach $113,000. How much money would need to enter the market? Why Citi thinks the institutional money is returning? And perhaps most importantly, whether $113,000 is actually an ambitious Bitcoin prediction at all.

Before we get into it, a quick word about Kraken. Kraken is the exchange we use, and if you're looking to open an account, using our link is one of the easiest ways you can support Crypto News Today and help us keep the podcast free from traditional advertising. If you sign up through our Kraken link, complete the qualifying requirements and message us afterwards, we're currently giving away 20 XRP to qualifying new signups. As always, nothing in this episode is financial advice. Crypto is volatile, predictions can be spectacularly wrong, and you should always do your own research. So let's start with what Citi has actually said. The bank has increased its 12-month Bitcoin forecast from $82,000 to $113,000.

It has also increased its Ethereum forecast from $2,240 to $3,028.

According to Citi, three things have changed enough to justify the upgrade. Crypto market activity has improved, the macroeconomic backdrop has become more supportive, and money has started flowing back into cryptocurrency investment products, particularly Bitcoin ETFs. The ETF part is probably the most interesting because Citi expects around $5 billion of inflows into crypto investment products over the next 12 months. And here's where the numbers start becoming strange. Bitcoin is currently around $85,000.

There are just over 20 million Bitcoin already mined. That puts Bitcoin's total market value somewhere around $1.7 trillion.

At $113,000 per Bitcoin, using roughly the same circulating supply, Bitcoin's market capitalization would be around $2.27 trillion.

In other words, somewhere in the region of another half a trillion dollars would appear on Bitcoin's market capitalization. But Citi is talking about only around $5 billion of incoming investment flows. So how can $5 billion potentially help create hundreds of billions of dollars in additional Bitcoin market value? Because market capitalization does not work the way a lot of people imagine it does.

You don't need $500 billion of fresh cash to increase Bitcoin's market cap by $500 billion.

Bitcoin's market cap is simply the latest market price multiplied by the number of coins in circulation. The price itself is determined at the margin, by the relatively small amount of Bitcoin actually being bought and sold. Imagine an extremely simplified example where the last Bitcoin changes hands at $85,000.

If buyers become more aggressive and sellers refuse to sell until $90,000, transactions start taking place around $90,000.

Suddenly every Bitcoin in existence is notionally valued using that $90,000 market price, even though nobody injected enough money to purchase every Bitcoin at $90,000.

This is why relatively modest capital flows can sometimes produce enormous changes in cryptocurrency market capitalization. And Bitcoin has an additional characteristic that makes this important.

Much of its supply simply doesn't move. Some Bitcoin is believed to be permanently lost. Huge quantities are held by long-term investors. ETFs hold Bitcoin. Corporate treasuries hold Bitcoin. Governments hold Bitcoin. Whales can sit on coins for years.

Therefore, the amount of Bitcoin realistically available for purchase at today's price can be dramatically smaller than the headline circulating supply.

If institutional demand rises while existing holders refuse to sell, buyers have only one option. Offer progressively higher prices. And this is where Citi's ETF argument begins making sense. September was a very strong month for American-spot Bitcoin ETFs. They recorded approximately $2.65 billion of net inflows. August had already produced roughly $3.52 billion.

So in just those two months, the ETFs attracted more than Citi's entire $5 billion 12-month inflow assumption. That doesn't guarantee anything. ETF flows can reverse incredibly quickly. We've already seen huge outflow periods. But it tells us something important about Citi's $113,000 calculation. They aren't necessarily basing their forecast on an enormous tidal wave of institutional money. Their assumption appears relatively restrained. The theory is that financial advisors, wealth managers and brokerages gradually increase their Bitcoin allocations, rather than suddenly dumping enormous percentages of client portfolios into crypto. And that gradual approach matters. Imagine a traditional wealth manager overseeing $10 billion.

They don't need to suddenly decide Bitcoin deserves 20% of every portfolio. Even moving half of 1% into Bitcoin creates $50 million of demand. Multiply tiny allocations like that across thousands of advisors, pension-related investment platforms, family offices, institutions and brokerage clients, and suddenly relatively small allocation decisions collectively become substantial. This is arguably the biggest structural difference between Bitcoin today and Bitcoin during earlier bull markets. Years ago, Bitcoin needed people to deliberately enter the cryptocurrency ecosystem. They needed an exchange account. They needed to understand wallets. They needed to overcome compliance issues.