Buy the Fear or Another 2022? Trump, the Fed & What Comes Next for Crypto

SPEAKER_1 (0:00)

Welcome back to the Daily Crypto Deep Dive. This week has handed investors three apparently contradictory messages. America's central bank has raised interest rates. Congress has failed to advance its flagship crypto market structure bill. And the Securities and Exchange Commission has opened a new route for tokenized stocks. So, which matters most? Is this an opportunity to buy while investors are distracted by frightening headlines? Or the kind of relief rally that trapped people in previous bear markets? Today, we're connecting the events, testing the analysts' arguments, and asking what the evidence means for portfolios, not just tomorrow's bitcoin price. My starting position is this. There is a case for selective gradual accumulation. But this week has not delivered an all-clear signal. The mistake would be treating improving regulation as proof that monetary conditions no longer matter, or treating one-rate increase as proof that the entire investment thesis has collapsed. Those are different forces, operating over different timescales. Start with Wednesday's Federal Reserve decision. The central bank raised its benchmark range by a quarter of a percentage point to 3.75% to 4%, with all 12 voters supporting the move. Its statement described resilient spending, strong productivity and elevated inflation. The updated projections put the median year-end policy rate at approximately 4.1% for both 20, 26 and 2027 Those projections can change, but they are not a forecast of imminent cheap money. The official message is that inflation still needs attention, even while the economy continues expanding.

That brings us to Trump. After the decision on September 16th, he demanded interest rates of 1% or less, and urged the Fed to lower borrowing costs quickly. He subsequently maintained confidence in Kevin Warsh while attacking the board as political.

These are consequential remarks, but they remain demands, not an implemented policy change. My portfolio interpretation is straightforward. Buying because Trump wants lower rates is not the same as buying because lower rates have arrived. His comments tell us what the president wants. The Fed's decision tells us what monetary policy actually is.

Tuesday's clarity setback needs equally precise treatment. The Senate voted 49 to 50 against invoking cloture on the motion to proceed. That was a failed procedural attempt to advance the legislation. Not a final vote passing a new law, and not a declaration that crypto is illegal. Nevertheless, it leaves the industry without the broader statutory framework supporters wanted. My assessment is that this matters more for businesses and assets whose investment cases depend heavily on unresolved regulatory treatment than for a blanket everything crypto trade. Then Thursday brought the counterweight. The SEC announced a conditional exemption allowing qualifying venues to trade certain tokenized stocks using permissioned automated market makers and liquidity pools. The exemptions expire five years after publication. Importantly, eligible stock tokens must provide equivalent shareholder rights, and the framework includes trading limits, transparency requirements, and safeguards. This is tangible infrastructure progress, not simply another support of speech. But it does not follow that every token associated with tokenization deserves a higher valuation. The investible question is still, which asset captures the economic benefit? Bitwise's Chief Investment Officer, Matt Hogan, offered the clearest bullish argument in his September 16th memo. He wrote that, Clarity's failure may matter far less than today's headline suggests. His evidence was that Bitcoin had climbed from roughly $57,950 on July 1st to above $80,000 by September 4th, while prediction market confidence in the legislation weakened. His argument is that institutional development can continue through existing authorities and agency rulemaking. That is a reasonable thesis, but the price comparison does not prove what caused the rally, and Hogan acknowledges that agency rules for less durability than legislation. The macroeconomic counterargument comes from Goldman Sachs, which now expects another quarter point Fed increase in October.

Bank of America's research team expects increases in both October and December. These remain forecasts, not settled outcomes, but they challenge the comforting assumption that this week's hike automatically marks the end of tightening.

My reading is that crypto infrastructure can improve while financing conditions become less favorable. A good long-term business story and a difficult short-term market can co-exist. Actual investment flows also complicate the bullish narrative. Farsight's figures show US spot Bitcoin ETFs attracted $159.9 million on Monday, followed by withdrawals of $450.4 million on Tuesday and $295.9 million on Wednesday.

That produces approximately $586.4 million of net outflows across those three sessions. Thursday's figures were not complete when checked. These products do not represent every buyer or seller, and their investors are not exclusively institutions. Still, the data does not support an uncomplicated claim that ETF money is aggressively buying this week's uncertainty.

Now put this against previous cycles. CoinDesk analyst James Van Stratton highlights an uncomfortable parallel. When the Fed began raising rates in March 2022, Bitcoin was already approximately 40% below its November peak. It then rallied roughly 18% over 12 days before subsequently falling around 50%.