Bitcoin ETFs Were Only Phase One — Wall Street Now Wants Crypto Yield

SPEAKER_1 (0:00)

Welcome back to the Daily Crypto Roundup. Bitcoin ETFs changed crypto forever. For the first time, investors could buy Bitcoin through the same brokerage accounts they used to buy Apple, NVIDIA or the S&P 500 No wallets, no seed phrases, no exchanges, no private keys.

But Bitcoin ETFs may only have been phase one, because Wall Street has now discovered something Bitcoin cannot offer. Yield. Today, a new exchange-traded product called the Canary Staked TRX ETF began trading in the United States under the ticker TRXS.

It is the first US-staked ETF specifically tied to Tron, and instead of simply buying TRX and waiting for the price to rise, the fund is designed to put those tokens to work through staking.

The rewards generated by that process are then reflected in the value of the fund. And this is much bigger than Tron. Because Ethereum can be staked, Solana can be staked, Tron can be staked, and suddenly Wall Street isn't just asking how it can package cryptocurrency. It is asking how it can package cryptocurrency that produces a return while investors hold it. That could fundamentally change the next stage of institutional crypto adoption.

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Deep Dive. The easiest way to understand what is happening is to go back to Bitcoin. When the first major US spot Bitcoin ETFs arrived, the proposition was incredibly simple. The fund bought Bitcoin. Investors bought shares in the fund. If Bitcoin went up, theoretically the fund went up. If Bitcoin went down, the fund went down. That simplicity was one of the reasons the product worked. Wall Street didn't need to understand mining pools, smart contracts or DeFi. Institutions simply received price exposure to Bitcoin through a financial wrapper they already understood. But proof of stake cryptocurrencies are different. Holding Ethereum, Solana or TRX without staking them can effectively mean leaving part of the economic return of the asset on the table. Staking involves committing cryptocurrency to the operation and security of a proof of stake blockchain.

In return, participants can receive additional tokens as rewards.

So imagine two investors. One owns an asset that rises 20%.

The other owns exactly the same asset, receives the same 20% price increase, but also earns additional tokens throughout the year. Everything else being equal, that second position has an economic advantage. And Wall Street understands yield extremely well. Banks understand interest. Fund managers understand dividends. Bond investors understand coupons. Pension funds understand income-producing assets. So once crypto entered the traditional ETF system, the obvious question became, why should a fund simply sit on stakable tokens when the blockchain itself offers a mechanism for earning additional assets? That is what makes TRXS interesting.

According to Canary's SEC filings, the fund's primary objective is exposure to TRX.

But its secondary objective is to earn additional TRX through staking.

Under normal conditions, Canary says it intends to stake essentially all of the fund's TRX except the amount it believes must remain available for redemptions, expenses and liquidity management.

Staking rewards can then be restaked, while accrued rewards are incorporated into the fund's daily net asset value. In other words, this isn't simply, buy TRX. Put it in custody. Forget about it. The assets themselves are being used to generate more assets. And Tron isn't alone. Solana staking ETFs already exist in the United States. Franklin Templeton's Solana product, for example, reported that almost 100% of its sole was staked in August, while its reported staking yield for July stood at 5.8%. Twenty-one shares also operates a Solana staking ETF. Then Morgan Stanley entered the market. In July, Morgan Stanley launched Ethereum and Solana exchange-traded products with a sponsor fee of just 0.14%.

And the bank said it would stake part of the Ethereum and sole held by those funds to generate staking rewards.

Think about how far this market has moved. Only a few years ago, the argument was whether major Wall Street institutions would ever touch cryptocurrency. Now we're debating how efficiently Morgan Stanley should stake Ethereum. That is a completely different conversation. And regulation has helped make it possible. One of the biggest historical problems surrounding staking in America was whether regulators might treat staking arrangements as securities transactions. That uncertainty made ETF issuers cautious. But in March this year, the SEC issued a broad interpretation of digital assets and specifically addressed protocol staking. The Commission said its framework recognized that many crypto assets are not themselves securities and provided clear treatment of protocol staking and other blockchain activities. That matters because once regulatory uncertainty falls, product development becomes easier. And this is where the really interesting part begins. Crypto ETFs are evolving from passive wrappers into productive wrappers.

Bitcoin is unusual because Bitcoin does not natively offer staking. There are ways of generating yield involving Bitcoin, but those normally require lending, derivatives, tokenization or additional counter-party risk. Native Bitcoin simply sits there. Its investment thesis is scarcity. 21 million coins.