AI's job impact remains unclear with conflicting data

**SPEAKER_1** (0:00)
This episode is brought to you by Accenture. When you're advertising operations fall out of sync, everything else follows. Spotify and Accenture are working together to reinvent the rhythm of ad sales. Using automation, analytics, and smarter workflows to simplify campaign delivery and access better data across the business. The result, less time spent on operations, more time connecting brands with the moments and fandoms that matter most. Learn more at accenture.com/spotify.

**SPEAKER_2** (0:30)
Heat up your 4th of July at the Home Depot with our wide variety of grills under $300 and make every gathering one to remember. Give your outdoor space a glow up. Whatever your budget is, the savings on seasonal plants starting at $5.
With the grill fired up and your backyard set to perfection, you'll be able to invite friends and family over to kick off the party. Start celebrating with low prices guaranteed at the Home Depot. Prices may vary by store, excluedions of pricey, homedepot.com, price match for details.

**SPEAKER_3** (1:00)
Are all batteries the same?
That's like asking if all soccer players are the same. Take Messi, the most decorated player ever. Is there any other player who has achieved that? No, just him. Now take Duracell. Is there any other battery with power boost ingredients inside? No, just Duracell. Remember, goats only trust goats, because they're built different. And Messi only trusts Duracell.

**SPEAKER_4** (1:30)
Mark Zuckerberg recently admitted his artificial intelligence agent Betts haven't come to fruition yet, while simultaneously a signed leather jacket from Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang is fetching over $40,000 at auction.

**SPEAKER_5** (1:42)
Yeah, the contrast there is just hard to ignore. I mean, you have the underlying technology really struggling to deliver on the promises made to consumers. The actual software that is supposed to be doing the work is stumbling and the people building it are openly admitting that it isn't quite functional for the average user yet. But then on the other hand, you have this absolute financial worship of the hardware executives powering it all. Someone is literally paying luxury car money for an article of clothing just because it was worn by the guy supplying the physical chips.

**SPEAKER_4** (2:13)
Exactly. So today, we have this massive stack of economic data, industry internal reviews, and consumer habit surveys to look at a very specific disconnect.
We are trying to understand this giant gap between the physical hardware creating instant billionaires.

**SPEAKER_5** (2:29)
And the soft wall side that remains entirely theoretical for the average person.

**SPEAKER_4** (2:33)
Right. The mission here is to figure out how this gap is altering basic economic reality for everyone.

**SPEAKER_5** (2:40)
Which leads to the main thing I keep thinking about as we go through this. If the biggest tech leaders are struggling to make this work, how can policymakers or economists possibly measure what this technology is actually doing to the economy?

**SPEAKER_4** (2:54)
Well, the truth is, nobody actually knows if these new tools are creating jobs or destroying them.
The data is entirely conflicting depending on where you look. You can find one government analysis showing administrative roles vanishing across the board, and then you turn around and look at an industry report, and it points to hiring booms in those exact same sectors. The numbers just do not align at all, and everyone is operating with entirely different baselines.

**SPEAKER_5** (3:19)
I always question how counting a job can remain so complicated. I mean, you hire someone or you don't, you keep them on payroll, you hand them a severance package. There are an entire federal and state agencies dedicated to doing nothing but tracking exactly that kind of movement. You would think it's just a simple binary mechanism.

**SPEAKER_4** (3:36)
It seems binary until you look at how the methodology works mechanically.
We are trying to capture a new type of economic activity using metrics built for an older era of labor. The traditional employment surveys were designed for factory floors and mid-century office structures. They track discreet job titles, fixed hourly shifts, and physical hiring events. Exactly. Think about your own office for a second. You might have a senior engineer using a new code generation tool to do the work of three junior developers. Those three junior roles were not eliminated in some highly publicized mass layoff event. They just never got posted to a job board in the first place.

**SPEAKER_5** (4:14)
So we're dealing with a phantom labor market. It is invisible friction. Traditional metrics miss it entirely because you cannot count a firing that never happened. The survey asks a business how many people they employ, not how many people they avoided hiring because an algorithm optimized their workflow.

**SPEAKER_4** (4:30)
If you're not subscribed yet, take a second and hit follow on whatever podcast app you're using. It helps us keep making this. We appreciate you being here.