AI Isnt Just Taking Jobs—Its Fabricating Facts

Rollo Tomassi (0:00)

My main concern with AI is not that it's going to take your jobs. My concern with AI is that it's going to retcon the truth, and people are going to believe that truth.

For example, I was talking about, I was talking about, I don't know what it was, birth rates. It was something with, anyways, I had Grok on there. Oh, and oh, I know what it was. It was, somebody was talking to me about, I think it was, it started off with abortions or like things that like men's sexuality is evil. And so I said, well, Grok, how many women, is it true that 50% of women in the United States have a plan B? Meaning they know a guy that they can go fuck and it's their fallback guy if things go sideways with their relationship or their marriage. I know this for a fact because I've been studying this. I've been writing articles about it since 2014, right? Grok goes, well, yeah, that is true. It comes from a 2014 study, but more recent studies say that only 16% of women have Plan B. I looked it up again. I went to Google, to the Google AI, and I put in the, I said, what are the statistics for women having a Plan B? And Grok presented its data saying that what I was talking about, the 50%, was from 2014 And the most recent one, which was like 2019, was only 16%. Guess what? There's even more real, there's even more recent data than that, that show that it's about 50% or 60% right now from 2024, 2025 I even asked Grok about this. I said, well, what about it? What about the Google AI seems to be a little bit more reliable here because you are neglecting to talk about all the ins, like that all of these separate studies that show that aren't as old as 2014, and they're not as recent as 2019 There's dozens of other studies, as a matter of fact, from 2014, 2016, 2019, 2024, 2025, as recently as 2025, about how women maintain a backup partner. Why are you not saying that, Grok? Why are you not including that into your summation here? Because most people will go, Grok, is this true? And then it'll be like some, you know, the tweet will say, it'll back up or it'll like, you know, counteract whatever they're saying. And they leave it at that. No, Grok is lying to you.

Grok is programmed to tell you what it's supposed to do. And guess what it's supposed to do? Uphold the female correct narrative. That's why. That's why it says, well, you know, in 2014, it says there's 50%, but it's really more like 16 right now. No, according to the 2024, 2025 polls, and that research, it's about 60%.

So how come, and I even said this, I even asked, I was talking to Grok, like it's actually a human being. Like, how come you don't include this in your summation? Well, I was trying to make a mean average from the, you know, the lowest to the highest and everything. I get this bullshit.

It's bullshit because it's fucking misleading is what it is. Okay, and so if it's misleading, where is it meant? How was it meant to sway your opinion? How was it meant to establish, or in this case, retcon truth?

That's the problem with AI.