“2027 Is Going To Be A Crazy Year” – Why Jacob Coxon Left Anthropic

SPEAKER_1 (0:01)

This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required, compatibility and availability varies 18 plus.

Patrick Bet-David (0:26)

So on September 8th, a Jacob Coxon who's here with us, good to have you on the podcast.

Jacob Coxon (0:30)

Nice to be here.

Patrick Bet-David (0:31)

You decide to put on a tweet, okay? You had started your account January of 2026 You hadn't put nothing up at all.

Your first tweet says, I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pre-training research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving super intelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below. We'll get into that later on.

And this tweet gets 803,000 likes, 175,000,000 views. There was a meeting yesterday at the White House, prompted by you indirectly. You got politicians that got involved, world leaders that got involved, a meeting that happened with G that was here last week. One of the topics of discussion was how powerful AI is going to be. And the funny part that I think is important for the audience to realize this, and you can fact check me on this, is that you let all your stocks go, that you weren't even able to vest your stocks because of the timing that you had, which means any money on the stocks that you also had was left behind for you, if that's correct, right? There was no, the options didn't move on with you.

Jacob Coxon (1:35)

Not at Anthropic.

Patrick Bet-David (1:36)

Not at Anthropic.

Jacob Coxon (1:37)

At OpenAI, you were there. I have an OpenAI.

Patrick Bet-David (1:39)

Okay, so you did all of that, and the world kind of stopped for a few days. Till today, they're still talking about it. What did you see that got you to say, I have to do this?

Jacob Coxon (1:51)

Yeah, it really was just thinking about next year. Next year and the year after. I think 2027 is going to be a crazy year. And I think about the news headlines. Like, so, last year, AI a bit in the news. Three years ago, it was very rarely in the news. Maybe for Chad GBT, but otherwise no. This year, it's bam, bam, bam. AI, every month, there's a big AI story.

Next year, it's going to be like every day, there's going to be a big AI story. In particular, just imagine, I don't know, I wasn't alive during World War II, but during World War II, I imagined that just the concept of war was coloring everything. It was in the background for every day-to-day thing. Like, every news story, war would be in the background. I think it will be like that for AI next year.

In terms of what I specifically saw, it is the models, the AI models next year, are going to be very capable. In a way where they're going to be able to automate a lot of work, a lot of everyone's jobs, but kind of most importantly, a lot of the AI researchers' jobs. So things are just going to speed up so much that it's going to become a very, very serious thing next year, probably.

Patrick Bet-David (2:54)

So 2027 for you is what's going to be, is it worth to use chaotic?

Jacob Coxon (3:01)

Chaotic, definitely, yes.

Patrick Bet-David (3:03)

So unpack it for me, like the average person listening to this, what does that look like?

Jacob Coxon (3:06)

Yeah. So there's many different things that could happen. Things that, kind of the most important thing is right now, labs are treating this like the companies are treating this like it's a normal technology. This is business, they have maybe you saw opening, I kind of, they have these dev days, they share their products with the users. They're still tweeting like, oh, excited to release this new product. Thing is, this is a super weapon.

So, soon people are going to have to realize that this is not like a casual business thing. This is like a super weapon technology that really should be nationalized. And I think next year is kind of probably when that realization really sets in, that this is like very, very serious stuff.

Patrick Bet-David (3:48)

You're saying it should be nationalized. So, if it's seriously that concerning, when you say nationalized, you trust the government getting involved to control this then free market.