Bryan Kohberger's Defense Found Unknown DNA at the Murder Scene — The Real Killer?

**SPEAKER_1** (0:00)
This is Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski. Here now, Tony Brueski.

**Tony Brueski** (0:07)
The real Kohberger. Some of you out there think you know a different version of Bryan Kohberger than the one that Bryan Kohberger has already presented to the world, in court, in his actions, in his writing, in the evidence, in pretty much everything. So we are going to do a little examination of some of these thoughts, these impressions, that he is someone other than who admitted and then obviously found guilty after admitting to the crimes in Moscow, Idaho. We're going to break down essentially the conspiracy theories and I know there's a lot of them out there. We're going to try and hit on some of the bigger topics here in this three part series that we're going to be dropping for you today. So if you have thoughts, I welcome them in the comment section on Substack and YouTube. All I ask is that you back up what you're saying with actual evidence, not feelings.
Feelings are one thing, evidence is another. It needs to actually be based on real evidence too. It can't be, I heard from a person of a person, you know, uncle's cousin, that's, you know, that's not anything, that's just noise. So whether you agree, disagree, I will respect you. But I do ask, whatever your opinions are, lay it out, lay it out in the comment section on Substack and YouTube. There's a leather knife sheath, sheath, I should say, lying in a dead girl's bed. The snap on it is still fastened. And on that snap sits the DNA of one man, not a smear, not a flake, not the kind of trace you squint at and argue over. There's, there's a lot of it. The lab that did the genetic work on this case said it out loud, and they, that they had pulled, I think this is important here, hundreds of times more DNA than they get in an ordinary case.
So it wasn't, it's not really, it's not up for debate. There was a lot of DNA on the knife sheath.
Unless you're going to believe that somehow someone in the lab is in on framing Bryan Kober, which doesn't make any sense. A lot of people have started getting involved to go down that road to frame a college weirdo in this who has a track record of not getting along with human beings. Anyway, I don't want to go to the rabbit holes too much here. Hundreds of times more DNA than they get in an ordinary case. Their own word for the amount was catastrophic for the man who left it. The sheath is the whole case. Nearly every theory you've heard about Bryan Koberger being framed, set up or quietly railroaded by a small town that needed somebody to blame runs straight through it and it stops dead. People who have spent years building careful stories about planted evidence is sloppy, rushed investigation. Every one of those stories depends on a single move. They need you to believe the one piece of physical evidence that matters doesn't mean what it plainly means. We're talking of course the Koberger conspiracy theories and we're taking them all apart. Like I said in this series, I welcome you to please give us your thoughts, press subscribe in the comment section and your thoughts there. The links are in the description. The forensics, the night itself and the people, those theories destroy this piece here, this part one in our three part series starts where all the theories start with the DNA. If you're just catching up, four students were stabbed to death at an off-campus house in Moscow, Idaho in November of 22 Kayleigh Gonzalves, Madison Mogan, and his anacronym Ethan Chapin. For six weeks after that night, nobody was arrested. Six weeks is a long time. It's long enough for an entire internet to solve the case in its own head before police said a single word in public. That silence is where the theories were born, not because the evidence was weak, because there wasn't any evidence in public yet, and people can't stand an empty space. Just look at the Nancy Guthrie case. They fill it in when there's nothing there. Usually, they fill it in with a story more thrilling than the truth. The truth is less thrilling than a cover up. The kind of DNA that we are talking about, touch DNA, is just skin cells. You shed them all day long when you grip something, when you handle it, when you pull a knife from a sheath, your thumb drags across the snap. You leave cells behind. A single source male profile on that snap isn't a mystery. It's a fingerprint made of skin left by the man who handled it. Boom, plain and simple.