SoftBank's $40B OpenAI Investment & Anthropic's Claude Mythos Leak

**Jayden Schaefer** (0:00)
Welcome to the podcast, I'm your host, Jayden Schaefer. Today on the podcast, guys, we have so much lined up. We have SoftBank that is lining up a $40 billion OpenAI investment. I'm gonna talk a little bit about where I think the money is going. We have Humanoid Robots that were at the White House recently, and this made a lot of headlines. We have an update on OpenAI, they're pivoting away from Sora, they're shutting it down, but apparently their pivot is going into robotics, so they're not just shutting down Sora, they're actually putting it somewhere else.
And we also have Apple, that is making a huge move with Syrian iOS 27, that affects basically every iPhone user ever, that I'm actually kind of excited about, and maybe turns Apple into a winner in an area where I thought they were only a loser in AI. The biggest story is that there is a data leak at Anthropic, and it revealed a secret model called Claude Mythos. Anthropic's own internal documents describe it as a quote unquote step change in capabilities, and they're saying that it poses an unprecedented cybersecurity risk. This is coming from the safety company, so we're going to unpack all of that on the podcast today. But first, really quick, if you're someone that is trying to keep up with all of these different AI models, Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, all of them, and you don't want to be paying $20 a month for every single subscription, go check out my startup aibox.ai where you will be able to access over 70 of the top AI models in one place, and you can chat with any of them, you can compare the outputs, and I think the part that is the most useful is that you can actually build tools and automations with them. So basically, you describe the tool you want, and we'll chain together and we'll add prompts and build the whole thing for you with no coding. I am not a developer, so I made this mostly for myself and now for everyone. So if you want to set up a content pipeline or a research workflow or basically anything where you're doing the same thing over and over again, you can automate that on AIbox. It's $8.99 a month and it's linked in the description, so go check it out, and yeah, let's get into the first story. The first thing I want to talk about is AI robots at the White House. This is kind of honestly just sort of like a funny story. A lot of people talked about it. I think there's like a headline on TechCrunch, which said like Melania Trump wants AI robots to homeschool your kids. Anyways, people are kind of just being funny with it, but basically what happened was Melania Trump brought in the Figure 3 humanoid robot, and it was basically walking around on two feet. It was greeting guests. It was speaking in 11 different languages. Now, I think on the surface, you can really look at this like a PR moment for Figure 3, and actually probably even the White House, right, to say like, look, we're like super high tech. But I think the reason why it matters is it's a signal of how fast physical AI is moving. If you look at a year ago, we were seeing these robots in these kind of controlled lab demos, and now we have one walking through the White House. I think this is a really big jump in a very short amount of time. And I think it connects a really big trend we see everywhere, which is just this week, Agile robots announced a partnership with Google DeepMind. They're going to integrate Gemini models into physical robots for manufacturing. They're also doing automotive and logistics. So you're seeing Google, OpenAI, and a bunch of other companies all converging on this idea that physical AI, which is robots that can actually do things in the real world, this is the next frontier. And I think we're going to be talking about this a lot more in the coming months. And I would say by the end of the year, we're going to see some pretty sizable rollouts of companies rolling this out in a big way.
The second thing I want to talk about is SoftBank's $40 billion OpenAI investment. So they're putting together this big round for OpenAI. I think this is obviously a massive number, but that's almost secondary to what it represents when industry is really headed in an interesting direction. I think for me, what it's showing is there is a barrier to entry for building these kind of top-line AI models, and this barrier to entry is very high. We have a lot of amazing companies, I mean myself included, taking these tools and building cool things with them. But if you want to be a frontier model company, the stakes and the barrier to entry is insane. And it kind of honestly makes me feel bad for some of these companies, like Mistral AI, which are just smaller in regional areas like France. And yes, they're raising billions of dollars, but like, are they able to raise $40 billion? Are they able to have the entire arsenal of Google behind them? Like, it's pretty hard to compete in these ways. I think it's not just about having the most talented research team anymore. You have to have billions of dollars in compute, in infrastructure, and you need to have the ability to scale your distribution globally at the same time. So I think a lot of these companies are really pulling further and further ahead, like OpenAI, like the top hyperscalers. They're getting way further than anyone else, just because they had the lead at the beginning. So SoftBank has basically made OpenAI a core pillar of their entire AI investment thesis. And when you look at the landscape, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, the gap between all of these front labs and everyone else is getting huge. So I think for the average person using these tools, it's actually a good thing. More investment means that more compute is going to make the models better. But from a competition standpoint, I think it raises a lot of questions about how concentrated this industry is going to get, right? It's becoming a very expensive game to play. And I mean, even if you think like $40 billion, let's say there was, you know, eight different AI companies and SoftBank gave each of them $4 billion, you could build some cool stuff, right? But like, would that be able to compete with Anthropic, OpenAI, Google? And that's kind of the question. So it's really, really wild, just the numbers that go into all of this. And unfortunately, I think it really makes it so there's not a lot of competition in the market. All right, the third thing I want to talk about is OpenAI's robotics pivot. So we already talked about robots walking around the White House. Recently, I gave an episode about OpenAI shutting down SORA, their video model. This is a bit of an update. The new detail is that the compute that they're basically turning off for SORA. So it was kind of very computationally intensive to run that video model. So they're shutting that down, and they're actually going to be giving that directly to robotics research. You can see this figure robot obviously is a big deal. A lot of optimist robots coming out of Tesla and everything there. This is a big deal. And so OpenAI, I think, is really focusing on maybe if they don't own the robotics company, like Elon owns Tesla with the optimist robots and he owns Grok, so obviously he's going to put Grok into those. If they can't have that kind of distribution where they own the robot company, maybe they need to start thinking about, well, if they don't currently own one, maybe they need to start thinking about how they can own one. They're not just making these kind of partnerships or they're working with other people to get in, but their AI could be swapped out. So I think they're putting a lot of these resources into a much, into a really interesting kind of field. I think they looked at AI video generation, they looked at robotics, and basically as a business decision, they had to pick one and they picked robotics. So I think right now, it's definitely worth paying attention to because it represents a really big shift in where the smartest people in AI think value is going to be created over the next few years. It's probably not going to be created in these short form little AI slop videos. That sounds so terrible because I actually think you can make some great videos and as the models get better, they'll be super useful for video production and a bunch of other things, but that's sort of what Sora was getting used for, and evidently they want to shift their image to something which is robots, which is going to give them a lot more ROI. Okay, the next thing I want to talk about, this is Apple's big play. I'm super stoked. Apple is planning to open up Siri to third party AI services through the App Store in iOS 27 So up until now, Chatjubt has had an exclusive integration with Apple Intelligence. That is going away. Basically what this means is that you could have Claude or Gemini or Grok or really any other AI model running your Siri for you, as long as the developer builds integration. So you'd essentially be choosing your AI assistant the same way you choose your default browser on iPhones. I think this is super cool. It's interesting. Apple never went down the route of building their own AI model. I think they just decided maybe it was too hard. They didn't have the talent. They didn't want to designate the money there. And instead, they're just reliant on other people. And they're just kind of building themselves as a shell around some of these other AI companies. A couple different reasons why I think this is happening. One series has been losing ground compared to what Claude and ChatGBT can do. And I think they know that. And number two, I think that by opening it up, they are essentially reducing their dependence on a single partner. They don't have to bet everything on OpenAI. They let the market compete and Apple just provides the platform. And I also think that right now everyone's basically, a lot of people are paying for their own AI subscription. I would be, I think it would be a smart move if, you know, instead of having to pay for a huge licensing deal with ChatGBT, whether that goes one way or another, they basically say, look, we'll let people pick their own platform. If you have a premium, you know, a pro subscription to OpenAI, maybe you grab your own API key or there's an integration with ChatGBT. So premium subscribers are going to get premium Siri. Anyways, it's an interesting thought. I think for anyone with an iPhone, which is right now over a billion people, this is one of those changes that you'll actually feel the AI assistant on your phone. I think it's going to get a lot more capable. Siri's obviously been terrible for forever. I'm really excited if this solves Apple's kind of AI problem and they can actually start making Siri useful again. I'd be thrilled. And I think this is a good move from Apple. All right. The last story that I want to do a deep dive on that is absolutely wild is coming out of Anthropic because they have leaked something called Claude Mythos. So it's basically this is what happened. There was a configuration error on Anthropic's content management system, basically their blog backend. And that made a bunch of unpublished draft posts publicly accessible. So, you know, when a company is getting ready to have a big announcement and they want the blog post published ahead of time and it kind of set up and ready to go, ready to post wherever they want it. And they had about 3000 assets that were never meant to be live. All of those were buried in the documents. And there was one of them that was a draft blog post about a model called Claude Mythos. So Anthropic has since confirmed that the model is real. A spokesperson said that it represents, quote, a step change in AI performance. And it is, quote, the most capable model we've built to date. So this isn't speculation. Anthropic has actually acknowledged that this exists. I think what makes this really interesting is that this was in those documents. The leak references a new model tier called Capybara. So basically for context, right now, Anthropic has Haiku, Sonnet, Opus, and those are kind of like their three from lowest to highest. Opus is their best model, Sonnet is kind of their medium, and Haiku is their light model. Capybara is above Opus, so it's kind of like the ultimate model. It's even better than Opus. And it's basically an entirely new tier. It's larger, it's more capable, and then anything that they publicly released, and Capybara and Mythos appear to be basically the same underlying model. So the benchmarks described in the document are huge compared to Claude Opus 4.6, which is already one of the strongest models available. It's basically my daily driver personally. Mythos is apparently scoring even higher on software coding, academic reasoning, and cybersecurity tasks. The thing that I think is really important is that Anthropic's own draft blog post, their, you know, this is their own internal writing, said that the model poses, quote, unprecedented cybersecurity risks. And I think you have to sit with that for a second, right? This is Anthropic, this is the company that has built their entire identity around AI safety. They have, you know, constitutional AI, they have, you know, responsible scaling policies, they've positioned themselves. It's like they go to war with the entire government, basically, to make their model safe and not used for, like, you know, quote, unquote, unsafe tasks or autonomous AI, all this kind of stuff, right? And their own documents are flagging this model as a cybersecurity concern. So I think that is pretty wild. Something, you know, basically how the markets are responding to this. Bitcoin dropped, software stocks dipped. I think this is, you know, pretty straightforward when you have a model that's dramatically better at cybersecurity. And the capability cuts both ways. It could be used to find and also patch vulnerabilities. So hackers can use it. And of course, we can use it to to counteract hackers. But it's definitely can be exploited. So I think when the company built it, it is already waving a flag about risks. And they're like, look, we're made this amazing thing. But there's a whole bunch of really big risks with it. And I think people are starting to take that seriously.